When I was in grade eight, I went with my school class on a field trip to Quebec – it was a rite of passage as we graduated from elementary to high school. One of the many wonders we saw was Montreal’s Olympic Stadium, with its suspended roof.
I still have the pictures from that field trip, showing the partially-covered stadium, as the roof was being repaired – again. That stadium has since been nicknamed by us Canadians as “the big owe,” because it – and much of the Olympics held in Montreal, Quebec in 1976, cost that province, the city and even the country more money than it brought in.
Ever since the Montreal Expos baseball team left Montreal (they went to just as lackluster a baseball town – Washington, D.C.) in 2004, Montreal’s Olympic Stadium has spent much of its time doing what it does best – fall apart.
Will the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympics currently center stage in the world’s media suffer the same fate?
Although it is amazing to be a citizen of the host country, are two-weeks of good press worth millions of lost tax dollars?
Final attendance figures won’t be in until the Olympics packs up and leaves Canada’s west coast, but already we are seeing a string of bad luck which could washout any chance of recouping municipal, provincial and federal money spent to bring the Winter Games to Canada.
From the very public torch malfunction during the opening ceremonies, to the latest hero at the 2010 Winter Olympics – a Zamboni – of all things.
The speed skating rink suffered a premature meltdown and the ice resurfacing machine onsite malfunctioned, which forced organizers to import a Zamboni all the way from Calgary, Alberta to repair the ice rink. The Zamboni brought in was the only one powerful enough to handle the Olympic-sized ice rink
Yesterday 20,000 ticket-holding fans weren’t let into the snowboarding venue – for their own safety – because people were falling and getting stuck between the bales of hay under the trucked-in snow used to create the observation areas. The snow had been melting under Vancouver’s warm weather, creating an unstable, and unsafe, observation area.
Early this morning, construction workers finally removed the chain-link fence preventing Olympic-goers from taking pictures of the giant Olympic cauldron. A Canadian TV reporter even called the barricade a “ratty-looking prison-camp fence.”
And nothing could ever overshadow the death of a Georgian Luger on the very first day of the Olympics, just hours prior to the opening ceremonies, during a training run. The luge track has earned a reputation since its opening in 2007 as the fastest, most challenging, most feared – and now the most deadly track in the world.
So, will the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympics go down bigger than the “Big Owe” in Montreal, and end up costing Canadian taxpayers more money?
Already the games have lost $1.5 million in revenues, from 28,000 canceled tickets at Cypress Mountain due to poor weather for the halfpipe and snowboardcross. Fans who spent the $50 to $65 to see the events will get their money back – but just add that to the cost to Canadian taxpayers to bring the games here.
Not to mention the cost to taxpayers to truck-in all the snow and snow-making equipment – Vancouver rarely gets much snow – who’s brainchild of an idea was it to hold the WINTER games there?
Rain and mild temperatures have prevented many events from going at their regularly scheduled times. Yesterday the men’s super-combined was postponed because of an overnight snowstorm, while the women’s downhill training was cancelled – the downhill training had previously been repeatedly postponed because of rain and warm temperatures.
Locals attending the games have begun to call it the Vancouver Summer Olympics, because of the mild wet conditions – but that joke is costing the games – and the Canadian taxpayer – plenty, with all the cancellations, and constant rescheduling of events.
The British press has already begun calling this the worst Olympic Games ever – even worse than the 1996 Atlanta Summer Olympics, which were marred by many technical problems, and overshadowed by a terrorist bombing. The “Brits” play host to the next Olympics in London.
Maybe all of this will be good for Montreal – no longer will that Canadian city stand alone in an Olympic-sized debt?
This isn’t the first time the city’s hometown team had a shut-out victory – last time was in 2002 – but the fans of Canada’s national game were all buzzing with anticipation – could this be THE YEAR?
“The year” being the first time in over four-decades that the Toronto Maple Leafs win the ultimate prize at the end of the season, the league championship trophy – the Stanley Cup.
Although last night’s game was an amazing victory for the ailing team, it was expected.
The team has made significant player moves over the past few days, resulting in a shakeup of the key players. In all professional sports, from baseball, football and soccer, to hockey, whenever there are significant changes to a team, regardless of who was moved out or in, the next few games are usually amazing victories.
This has more to do with the excitement, energy and need for the new players to prove their multimillion dollar contracts are worth all those digits, than anything else.
In 1989, Toronto’s professional baseball franchise, The Toronto Blue Jays, brought in veteran center fielder Mookie Wilson to lift the teams spirits and scores. At first it worked, and fans began chanting “Moookie” to cheer on their new fan favorite. But as the excitement of the moment faded, so too did Wilson who played his last Major League Baseball game as a Toronto Blue Jay on October 6, 1991, never making the championship team which won back-to-back World Series in 1992 and 1993.
The Toronto Maple Leafs have had some big player trades over the past four decades, yet despite a loyal fan base, they never go all the way to the championships.
This has lead the hockey team to being something of an anti-hero joke to Torontonians. At the start of every hockey season the local media asks people on the streets if the ‘Leafs’ will win the Stanley Cup, and every year most think they will. And as the hockey season winds down and the Toronto Maple Leafs play their last game, many Toronto fans say are left saying “maybe next year.”
Hockey is Canada’s national sport – officially if you read up about it, it is actually curling, but there isn’t enough violence in curling to warm the hearts and minds of us peace-loving Canadians. When was the last time you heard of a bench clearing brawl in a curling match?
Nevah!
From the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation’s (CBC) classic coverage of Hockey Night in Canada with the always loudly dressed and loudly opinionated Don Cherry, from coast-to-coast-to-coast, hockey is Canada’s game.
If hockey hadn’t captured our nation as much as it had, the Toronto Maple Leafs would have folded as a business long ago.
In professional sport, it isn’t whether you win or lose that matters. What does matter is fan support – if no one pays the high prices to go to the games, or pay outrageous dollars on overpriced team merchandise like hats, jerseys and bobbleheads, then the team fails as a business, and closes.
That’s what happened to Montreal’s professional baseball team – the Montreal Expos – remember them? They were even winning towards the end, with rumors of a possible playoff of America’s past time (baseball) solely happening in Canada between the Montreal Expos and the Toronto Blue Jays in the early 1990’s.
But sadly, Montreal sports fans were more into hockey than baseball, and as fewer and fewer people went to Montreal’s baseball games, eventually the team just died. The Montreal Expos became the Washington Nationals in 2005.
Which brings us back to Toronto’s professional hockey team – The Toronto Maple Leafs. They haven’t had a winning season in over forty-years, yet they bring in the big bucks thanks to loyal (though somewhat misguided) fans.
Those loyal Toronto Maple Leafs fans make the team the most valuable one in the NHL – the team is worth an estimated $470 million, the league’s next most valuable teams are the New York Ranges and the Montreal Canadiens respectively.
Every so often, the owners of the Toronto Maple Leafs see fit to inject some money back into the team, and we end up with a handful of new star players, raising team and fan spirits alike.
But these team changes are really nothing more than clever ploys to keep fans and players interested, instead of actually playing to win. If the later were the case, then the ‘Leafs’ would have won Lord Stanley’s prestigious cup more frequently. The last time the Toronto Maple Leafs won the Stanley Cup was 1967 – that’s 43-years ago!
It has been so long since Toronto’s professional hockey team has won the championship that if they were to win it ever again, the world were surely stop spinning and we’d all be thrown off. Or at least, that would be the sensation for fans, players and even those who don’t follow the game but know of the Toronto Maple Leafs and their history of failure.
And that is what it is – a history of failure because let’s face it, in professional sport, where millions of dollars are at stake, the object of the game is to win the championship. It isn’t quite like your kid’s hockey league, where healthy fun in a team-building atmosphere teaches life lessons. In professional sport everything comes to dollars for the victor, and coal for the loser.
Despite the winning mood inspired by recent trades in Toronto, The Maple Leafs will end their season just as they have for 43-years – with nothing more than lumps of coal.
Jordan H. Green began his never-ending journey for life-long learning while writing for the campus paper in university.
From student protests, to student politics, he eventually discovered his passion for knowledge -- and even more importantly, that he could write.
And write he did, for major big city dailies, small town weeklies, monthly magazines, even doing on-air work in television and radio -- Jordan mastered the media.
Jokingly calling this blog his place to "bitch and moan" he's once again mastering the media -- this time that new fangled thing called "the net."
Enjoy.
Want to chat and discuss what you see here with Jordan H. Green? Check us out on Facebook and on Twitter -- follow the links on the main page, or search for "Jordan's Daily."